Services
Related Practice Areas
Attorneys
- David Arnold
- Karl Barr
- Asaf Batelman
- H.M. (Bud) Bedingfield
- Christopher Boehm
- David Bomzer
- J. Michael Buchanan, Ph.D.
- Aaron Bumgarner
- Michael Cantor
- Vincent Cichosz
- Philmore Colburn II
- Pamela Curbelo
- Tam Dinh, Ph.D.
- Daniel Drexler
- Grant Ehrlich, Ph.D.
- Mia Fiedler
- David Fox
- Todd Garabedian, Ph.D.
- Daniel Gibson
- Jenae Gureff
- Peter Hagerty
- Alicia Hayter
- Victor Kernus
- Jaehoon Kim
- Sung Wook Kooh
- M. Brad Lawrence
- Daniel Lent
- Howard Levy
- Victor Libert
- Paul Madan
- Leslie-Anne Maxwell, Ph.D.
- James Merrick, Jr.
- Duane Minley
- Keith Murphy
- Charles O'Brien
- Matteo Pedini
- Roberta Pelletier
- Leah Reimer, Ph.D.
- David Rodrigues, Ph.D.
- Thomas Ryan
- Michael Rye
- Alex Tucker
- Karl Vick
- Jeffrey Waters
- Wanli Wu
- Bryan Zerhusen, Ph.D.
- Susan Zerull
Right to Practice Opinions
For clients seeking to establish whether or not their new products or processes might infringe on any existing patents, a right to practice opinion may be useful.
Cantor Colburn attorneys are highly experienced in preparing clearance, or right to practice, opinions. Our first-hand practical and technical understanding of the technologies that drive many of our clients’ businesses provides depth in performing right to practice opinions in a clear and concise manner.
We regularly render timely right to practice opinions for clients who are contemplating the development of new products and who wish to assess whether this product may be covered by a competitor’s patent. By generating right-to-practice or clearance opinions of a target product in its early stages of development, our clients are provided with a competitive advantage.
